| Application
Process
 “The
early bird catches the worm.”-Anonymous
One
of the most important aspects of the application process
is to accomplish tasks in a timely fashion. This means
taking the April MCAT, sending in transcripts early,
and starting to work on your essay, including the
personal statement. While it is not necessary to send
in materials on the earliest possible date, it is
to your advantage to be early throughout the whole
process, including finishing the primary and secondary
applications. The earlier you secure letters of recommendation,
the better. You should even start writing the infamous
“M.D./Ph.D. essay” that will focus on
your motivations for the combined degree and previous
research experience and accomplishments. This helps
expedite the admissions process. Chances are that
you’ll be granted interviews at an earlier time.
That
being said, we want to emphasize that you really need
to send in your application materials WHEN THEY ARE
READY. The application process is about presenting
yourself in the best possible light. This means taking
the time to revise and polish your essays, making
sure grades are properly reported on transcripts,
tidying up secondary applications, and ensuring that
you are giving yourself the best possible chance by
starting off on the right foot. Therefore, we recommend
that you don’t rush and do a poor job, but take
the time to really think about your responses to questions
and to describe your research and motivations for
the M.D. and Ph.D. degrees. After all, Rome wasn’t
built in a day.
As
other premedical texts cover the basics of the admissions
process in great detail, here we will be approaching
the subject from a perspective relevant to M.D./Ph.D.
applicants. For more detail on the specifics of the
AMCAS and other components of the application, we
refer you to the AAMC web site: http://www.aamc.org/students/start.htm
AMCAS: Laying the Foundation
The
first step is to complete the primary application
using the American Medical College Application Service.
Most American medical schools with M.D./Ph.D. programs
take part in this centralized service. It is designed
to be a standardized application that is submitted
to all of the medical schools to which you choose
to apply. Currently, the latest version is online
(to the chagrin of many premedical students). Given
the fluid nature of Web media, the application will
likely evolve considerably over the next several years.
A new addition, highly relevant for M.D./Ph.D. applicants
is the section that includes checkboxes relating to
combined degree interests. Medical schools will now
see that you are applying M.D./Ph.D. even before they
decide to send out secondaries. The catch is that
there are separate M.D. and M.D./Ph.D. boxes, and
thus the applicant must decide early on whether to
pursue M.D./Ph.D. or M.D.-only. It is presently unclear
as to how this will effect admissions, but it is unlikely
that schools will discriminate between types of applicants
in this initial process (UCSF does not, for example).
There is pressure from M.D./Ph.D. programs to find
out how many applicants are applying this route, and
thus AMCAS is likely to make revisions in the coming
years. For example, the following questions could
very well make their way onto the AMCAS application:
1) Briefly state how a combined degree would satisfy
your career goals.
2) Please describe your research experience including
the nature of the research problem and your role on
the project.
A
major decision to make at this point is to how many
schools you should apply. We recommend that you first
do some research by browsing various schools web sites
and seeing 1) if they have an M.D/Ph.D. program, 2)
if the M.D./Ph.D. program is an MSTP (visit http://www.nigms.nih.gov/funding/mstp.html),
3) the procedure for applying. Schools vary considerably
in their requirements and application procedures.
You should also think if you could actually see yourself
at that particular school. For example, if you don’t
like frigid weather, your research interest is in
a particular field, or you want to apply to programs
with particular strengths, that might narrow the field.
Don’t apply to programs you really would not
attend. It will be become obvious that you aren’t
interested.
However, a word of caution: don’t eliminate
too many options at this point. It is better to overshoot
the number of schools to which you apply. Often it
takes actually the firsthand experience of visiting
the school (i.e. on interviews, revisit weekends,
etc) to determine if you would attend. M.D./Ph.D.
applicants traditionally apply to fewer schools than
their M.D.-only counterparts, usually somewhere in
the range of 10-15. Perhaps this is because they have
stronger academic records. Or maybe there are fewer
schools in which they are interested. The point is
that you’ll have to decide to how many you will
apply by assessing the strength of your academic record,
research experience, letters of recommendation, and
other factors.
Given
that the AMCAS is a primary application received by
medical schools, and is NOT a graduate school application
(or M.D./Ph.D. application for that matter), we suggest
that you save detailed descriptions of your research
for the M.D./Ph.D. applications that come with secondaries.
Instead, write essays such as the personal statement
with medicine in mind. It is fine to talk about science
and your research background,but remember that medical
school admissions committees read these essays and
may be a little worried if you present yourself as
only interested in science. You might mention something
about the interface of science and medicine in your
essays, but the main focus should be on the experiences
that have led you on the path to becoming a physician.
Remember, there are no steadfast rules and individual
experiences have been highly variable. Usually it
is best to present yourself as a thoughtful individual
with a passion for both medicine and science. You
will be required to carefully bridge the dichotomy
between degrees many times over throughout the application
process (not to mention in your career as a physician-scientist).
So tread lightly and use your common sense.
Secondaries
So,
you have finally finished the primary application
and have gotten to breathe a big sigh of relief. Enjoy
it because when secondaries hit your mailbox, you’ll
be taking on a full-time job. Not only will you be
required to fill out the multitude of medical school
secondaries, but you’ll have to complete the
additional enclosed M.D./Ph.D. applications. This
is by no means a trivial task. Although you will be
tempted to make a half-hearted effort here, don’t
forget that the secondaries are at least as important
as the AMCAS application.
Schools
differ in their procedure for sending out secondaries.
Some screen applicants based on the primary application,
but others automatically send a secondary to all who
use AMCAS. Secondaries typically ask for additional
information, including essay-style responses to profound
questions such as “What makes you special?”
They typically want additional personal information,
volunteering hours, research experiences, etc. Don’t
take these questions lightly. It is best to work on
one application at a time, in a thorough manner. You
will see that secondaries get exponentially easier
to complete with each additional one, as you can cut
and paste essay responses. Some secondaries ask if
you are applying M.D./Ph.D. Others ask to specify
either 1) M.D., 2) M.D./Ph.D. only, or 3) both. There
usually isn’t a disadvantage to specifying the
third option, but if you select the second, you probably
won’t be considered for just the M.D. if you
don’t get in for the M.D./Ph.D. program. Yet
other secondaries don’t ask you to specify,
and simply include an additional application specific
for M.D./Ph.D. applicants. You are still required
to fill out everything, including the secondary.
Frankly,
the process of what to fill out is somewhat confusing
for M.D./Ph.D. applicants. Most secondaries are fairly
straightforward, even if applying M.D./Ph.D. However,
some do not have an integrated process, and thus you
must apply separately to both the medical and graduate
schools. We recommend that you check with your schools
of interest for the proper procedure. Also, if you
have any questions, feel free to give the program
administrator a phone call. Unlike M.D.-only admissions
officers, M.D./Ph.D. administrators deal with a limited
group of applicants each year. Consequently, they
are considerably less stressed and often more willing
to go the extra mile for you.
The M.D./Ph.D. Application
The
M.D./Ph.D. application that is typically included
with secondaries will most often ask for your personal
and contact information, coursework, MCAT scores,
GPA, research awards, publications, names of research
advisors who are writing your letters of recommendation,
and an essay describing your past research experiences,
your career goals, and why you want to pursue an M.D./Ph.D.
program.
Don’t
simply repeat the AMCAS section for awards and honors,
but do include items relevant to research. The idea
is to convey a sense of research accomplishments.
As far as we’re concerned, no award is too big
or small to list. Some will be recognized nationally
(i.e. Westinghouse, Howard Hughes, etc), but others
you’ll have to explain during interviews if
asked.
As
for publications, there are many different formats
in which you may have presented your work. The best
situation would be to have one or more manuscript
publications in scientific journals, with full literature
citations. You could even include reprints with the
application, if available. However, most applicants
do not have publications. Many have abstracts which
can be cited using the appropriate format. Also, research
presentations or conferences attended can be listed
if you presented work either in lecture or poster
format. These are not technically publications, but
would be of interest to admissions committees because
they show experience in various forms of scientific
communication.
The
M.D./Ph.D essay should discuss primarily your interest
in science, but also some information on your medical
interests. Be sure you know why you want both degrees
and provide evidence to back up your assertions! It
is critical that you show your development as a potential
scientist through concrete examples. You want to convey
a sense of maturity. We recommend that you weight
your discussion on the side of science,as you had
the opportunity in the AMCAS application to talk about
medicine. It is highly recommended that you treat
this essay with care equivalent to that you showed
with your personal statement.
Try
to describe your research experiences from a larger
perspective. Admissions committees don’t want
to hear about making buffers, doing PCRs, running
gels, etc. Instead, they are looking for evidence
of critical thinking, level of contribution to a project,
independence in the laboratory, scientific participation
(i.e. conferences, presentations, seminars, etc),
and knowledge of the scientific process. Most importantly,
they want to see that you can communicate complex
scientific topics in a manner that an educated person
(i.e. not an expert in the field) can understand.
Avoid unnecessary use of acronyms and abbreviations
and try not to sound too technical. You’ll get
a chance later in interviews to explain the project(s)
in gory detail (if they ask you to do so).
It
is usually a good idea to have several people read
your essay to help you revise. This should include
those familiar with your particular projects (i.e.
your advisor, postdoctoral fellows, graduate students,
technicians, etc). Never underestimate the value of
revision.
Again,
take your time on the secondaries, but try to be as
efficient as possible. The ealier you turn them in,
the faster you’ll be granted interviews. However,
the response time varies considerably, so don’t
panic if the schools take a while to get back to you.
Usually, postcards are included with your secondaries
to notify you when all materials have been received.
If you are unsure, bypass the M.D. admissions office
and call the M.D./Ph.D. program directly to ensure
the completion of your file.
Letters of Recommendation
Schools
ask you to send letters of recommendation, which is
typically done using a specialized service or premedical
committee at your school. If you have graduated already,
you may have to ask your professors to send letters
directly to individual programs, along with evaluation
forms included with the M.D./Ph.D. application. You
will often be required to send separate sets of letters
for the medical and M.D./Ph.D. applications. We recommend
that for the latter, you seek letters from those who
can best assess your potential for a career in research.
Admissions
committees desire an outside perspective on the applicant’s
strengths and weaknesses. Try to get letters from
professors who know you well. In the laboratory, often
the day-to-day contact is not with the principal investigator
(P.I.), but a postdoctoral fellow or graduate student.
Though P.I.s are usually very busy, attempts should
be made throughout your laboratory experience to meet
and talk about your projects and career goals. The
amount of personal contact you receive will depend
on several factors, including the size of the lab.
How
do I ask for a letter, especially if I fouled up in
the lab? Take Jeremy’s experience as an example:
I started working in a lab during my freshman
year of college and one of the first things I had
to do was make a stock solution of ethidium bromide
(a known mutagen). My P.I. was in the lab at the time
and therefore I was really nervous. I was kind of
shaking and ended up spilling half the bottle of purple
powder all over the balance and weighing area. My
face went bright red and I could sense every member
of the lab staring at me. Fortunately, my P.I. noticed
my embarrassment and was compassionate enough to actually
helped me clean it up himself. I thought I was a goner
for sure! Despite this incident, I ended up working
in that lab during all four of my undergraduate years
and I have no doubt that my advisor's glowing letter
was instrumental in helping me get into several M.D./Ph.D.
programs. Now when I look back at my trials and tribulations,
missteps and mishaps, bumbling and clumsiness in the
lab, I just laugh. Don't take it too seriously. In
the beginning, everyone knows that you are new and
still learning. People honestly don't think about
it as much as you think they do. I'd say that if you
have contributed something meaningful to the lab and
your advisor can write about your hard work, dedication,
and potential, then you will likely receive a great
recommendation.
If
you want to talk with your research advisor, a good
way to go about it is to knock on the door and ask
if there is a good time to meet. Be up front and convey
what you want to discuss. The best thing to do when
seeking a letter is to ask directly: "Do you
think you would be able to write a strong letter of
recommendation for me?" Your advisor will most
likely give you an honest answer. Make sure you supply
a curriculum vitae (c.v.) and a personal statement
that outlines your interests, experiences, and goals.
You should meet and discuss your interests and goals,
which will give your advisor more to write about in
the letter.
You
absolutely want the best research letter possible.
A factor to consider also is the status of your advisor
in the scientific community. A letter from a well-known
P.I. who publishes well will probably give you an
advantage in the process. However, most applicants
do not come from big-name laboratories. What is most
important here is the quality of your letters, not
necessarily who writes them. Of course, a letter from
a P.I. is usually weighed more heavily than one from
a postdoctoral fellow or graduate student. However,
an additional letter from a postdoc with whom you
have worked closely could offer additional and perhaps
more personal insight.
Whoever
you get to write your letters, make sure you give
them sufficient time to make them great. Usually a
month is the standard waiting period. Don’t
ask the day before the letters are due, when your
P.I. has a huge grant due the same day. Faculty usually
run extremely tight schedules and will grow very impatient
with pushy students demanding letters.
The
key to obtaining successful M.D./Ph.D. letters is
to choose people who can describe your research accomplishments,
ability to succeed inresearch training, and potential
for an excellent career in science.
  
|